The couple, yet inseparable, continues to play hide and seek with the media.

For months, rumors have been rife about a supposed idyll between Katharine McPhee and David Foster. Long-time friends, the 33-year-old singer and the famous 68-year-old producer have collaborated together many times in recent years. The obvious complicity that binds them makes them talk, and several languages are untied to confirm what everyone already knew: between them, it is much more than friendship. ” It’s not a superficial relationship, but they’re not exclusive, Kat thinks it should be a little more serious, but he wants something light, ” it was revealed on October 23rd.Us Weekly.

However, the pretty brunette revealed in 2005 in the tele-hook American Idolcontinues to stand up to the media, refusing to admit any love story with the former husband of Yolanda Hadid, mother of Gigi and Bella. Interviewed in the new edition of Health magazine, a publication for which she poses very sexy on the cover, the young woman assured that she did not form a couple with her mentor. ” I’m single, I’ve had a relationship with Elyes Gabel [her partner in the Scorpion series, Ed] for almost two years … But I’ve not had anything really serious since ” she said. Explain.

As for his ambiguous relationship with David Foster, she assures that it is nothing more than a beautiful friendship. ” David and I are very close friends, and we’ve been friends for a long time, I really love him, really a lot and I think he’s an incredible person, I’ve known him since I was 21 years, you know, he produced my first single, he was really sweet to me, people can say what they want, “she concluded.

 

But why does Katharine McPhee continue to deny the obvious? In late October, the singer was again spotted on David Foster’s arm in the streets of Brentwood, Los Angeles.

Arm in arm, the lovebirds probably did not know they were being watched by the paparazzi. And Katharine McPhee also did not know that pictures of her fondling her friend’s buttocks and kissing her softly on the cheek were captured at that time. The pictures, available on the website of Daily Mail, so speak for themselves. And for this reason, the doubt is well raised.