It would seem, who could insult the naked torso of Adam Levin? As it turned out, fifty viewers who filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission. According to the disgruntled, the musician had no right to undress during a performance at the Super Bowl, given that the same behavior once almost ruined Janet Jackson’s career.
Even partial exposure of men and women in society is perceived differently. This fact angered fifty spectators of the Super Bowl, who did not want to put up with this situation and complained to the Federal Communications Commission of the United States demanding that CBS and Adam Levin be fined for showing their nipples. They all remembered that in 2004, when Justin Timberlake accidentally exposed Janet Jackson’s bosom, the channel had to pay $ 550,000, and the singer herself lost several projects, was unable to perform at the Grammy and was forced to apologize. According to the viewers, if Levin’s exposure is not punished, then double standards rule the society.
But fifteen years ago, viewers complained about the incident that happened to Jackson. Then the commission received more than half a million complaints from those who did not believe in the “malfunction of the wardrobe” of the singer, as Timberlake later claimed. The fact is that Janet’s ill-fated nipple was decorated with an accessory in the shape of the sun, which didn’t make sense to wear if the baring was not planned.